TriOptima named Best Compression and Optimization Service

TriOptima named Best Compression and Optimization Service

 

As the transition to the new capital regime on counterparty risk and uncleared financial instruments gathers pace, an increasing number of firms with substantial exposure to over-the-counter (OTC) FX derivatives are looking for ways to reduce their gross notional and counterparty exposure in the most efficient manner.

In 2021, their toil is proving particularly laborious. Hundreds of firms will have been caught by phase five of the uncleared margin rules (UMR), which took effect on September 1, and many more will have to adapt the manner in which they calculate their exposure to derivatives contracts when the last remaining – and some of the largest – jurisdictions shift from the current exposure model to the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR) by the end of 2021.

To fulfil their obligations, many financial firms have sought out TriOptima’s compression and optimization solutions over the past year, with noteworthy effects on the risk exposure of those in the network.
In January alone, $541 billion of gross notional was eliminated by TriOptima’s clients through its triReduce compression service, more than double the amount achieved the previous year. And, similarly, the triBalance service executed its largest ever optimization FX cycle at the beginning of 2021.

“Looking at the past 12 months, I’m most proud of the fact that we are live optimizing capital exposures in an ever-growing network,” says Erik Petri, head of triBalance solutions at TriOptima. “I can say with confidence that we offer the market’s largest optimization network for bilateral counterparty credit risk for the FX market.”

While reducing gross exposure to meet UMR rules and rebalancing counterparty risk to satisfy SA-CCR requirements can be met separately, Petri strongly encourages firms to accomplish both of these within the same cycle, rather than running separate compression and optimization cycles.

“It is extremely important for firms to consider optimizing both UMR and SA-CCR in one go,” he says. “Otherwise they risk suppressing one exposure while increasing the other, and that’s not ideal. In the FX market there is the opportunity to optimise the two in an extremely efficient way.”

The way TriOptima enables firms to achieve both goals simultaneously is that, during the compression side of the cycle, a set of forward and swap trades are replaced with new transactions with a combined gross notional that is worth less than the original notional. During the optimization portion of the cycle, short-term risk-reducing FX non-deliverable forwards and forward hedge trades are introduced across all relationships so each participant remains market-risk neutral. In this way, both initial margin and counterparty credit exposures can be reduced simultaneously, while at the same time reducing the gross notional outstanding.

Until recently, running this type of scenario was largely the remit of global systemically important banks – known as G-Sibs. In the past 12 months, however, an increasing number of smaller sell-side players have joined TriOptima’s network, with the buy-side also showing interest in the benefits that compression and optimization can offer.

“We are now seeing that interest filtering beyond the top-tier banks with regional banks and second-tier banks more focused on net optimization, not only because of the introduction of SA-CCR but also more generically,” says Mattias Palm, head of triReduce FX at TriOptima.

“While SA-CCR is only applicable to banks, we also see increasing interest on the buy-side, even though they’re not directly driven from a capital cost perspective,” says Palm. “Bilateral exposure comes with a cost to everyone, and a lot can be done across all kinds of institutions to minimize it.” While making the necessary technological investments to centralise their portfolios can be considerable for many firms, the benefits for TriOptima’s network of participants, that come from reducing risk through compressing and rebalancing a derivatives portfolio, can run into the millions, not only in the funding cost of initial margin but also the cost of capital.

“It’s impossible to put an exact number at the moment, but we know there are significant savings to be achieved,” says Petri.

“The transition to SA-CCR is a big deal for the industry,” he says. “And it’s something that we expect will drive growth over the coming years. There will be an increased need in the FX industry to keep counterparty credit risk down through rebalancing and compression. FX is one of the asset classes where bilateral liquidity – in terms of outstanding trades – is significant.”

Also worth noting is that OSTTRA’s triCalculate has developed an SA-CCR engine that calculates SA-CCR figures for portfolios containing a wide variety of derivatives transactions – margined and unmargined, as well as bilateral and cleared – across all asset classes, according to the latest guidelines.

OSTTRA’s TriOptima was voted Best compression and optimization service for FX at the 2021 FX Markets e-FX Awards.

OSTTRA triCalculate: Initial Margin Analytics

Case Study 1

Client type: European Pension Fund
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations and Pre-deal check simulations
End User: Derivatives trading and structuring desk

Challenges

Our client who manages the derivatives trading desk at a large European insurance company needed a fast and efficient way of running ‘what-if’ initial margin scenarios in order to optimise exposures before derivatives trade execution.

The client is using OSTTRA triCalculate to calculate their daily IM exposures for derivatives subject to uncleared margin rules. They also benefit from the pre-deal check capabilities of the service which allows them to make informed trading decisions when pricing new deals to find the optimal counterparty in terms of IM. They have been using the service since coming into scope as part of phase 5 of the uncleared margin rules and value having the ability to run fast and efficient pre-deal check simulations. Additionally, they use the pre-deal check module to help mitigate the risk of breaching regulatory UMR or internal thresholds.


 

Case Study 2

Client type: Leading US Regional Bank
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations, stress testing and forecasting
End User: Collateral management team

Challenges

Our client who is part of the regional bank’s collateral management team, needed daily IM exposure calculations.

The client needed to simulate changes to trade populations and to assess their impact on their IM exposures as their auditor required the bank to monitor how trade expirations were leading to changes in IM.

Additionally the client had an internal requirement to occasionally benchmark how their IM exposures would change if they switched calculation model by using the schedule/grid approach instead of the more risk sensitive SIMM™ model. The client’s risk team also required the collateral team to stress their IM exposures by using stressed and/or alternative sources of market data.


 

Case Study 3

Client type: European Regional Bank
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations and regulatory model backtesting
End User: Credit Risk Manager

Challenges

Our client manages the credit risk management team of a large regional bank that was in scope for the uncleared margin rules for derivatives transactions.

They needed a solution for calculating their daily IM exposures and also a tool to help them cope with the regulatory requirement of backtesting the SIMM™ model on a quarterly basis. The bank required a backtesting solution to compare the 10 day SIMM™ IM to 10 day actual P&L moves.


 

Our Solution

These firms took the decision to use OSTTRA for their regulatory IM calculations. The service provides an easy-to-use, web-based solution that streamlines the daily IM process. Our clients benefit from transparency into their IM exposures and the ability to gain a more detailed understanding of their overall IM exposures through pre-deal check simulations, backtesting reports and IM analytics via an intuitive and flexible interface. The interactive interface further allows clients to decompose their total IM exposures into its different components and to run detailed P&L explain reports to understand day-to-day changes in margin amounts.

All clients also benefit from being able to run simulations on trade population changes through the interactive interface by uploading amended input files or performing simulations using alternative market data.

 

For more information about the our Initial Margin analytics service, please email info@osttra.com.

Centralising the reconciliation process for a US Corporate

Client type: Mid sized corporate
Existing reconciliation: In-house/manual

 

Challenges

The firm uses portfolio reconciliation as a financial control around swap position verification and to support the collateral disputes and hedging processes. In addition, they use counterparty mark-to-market as an observation point in their own pricing validation routines.

This was a manual undertaking they supported by collecting daily dealer statements for both swap positions and collateral positions, each from a different source and in its own format.

Given increasing trading volumes and number of counterparties, the lack of automation in the portfolio reconciliation process meant that the operations team struggled to manage these manual tasks in a timely and efficient manner:

The manual nature of the tasks, as well as the dependency on counterparties’ timing and consistency in delivering required statements, meant that a lot of the team’s time and resource was being used to complete the process.

 

Time pressure, a lack of an organised workflow and a multiple-touch point process led to a greater risk of work repetition and an increased number of errors.

 

With an increasing workload, resolving the root cause of the differences was harder to achieve, which in turn was increasing the number of issues. In addition, the lack of transparency on the positions between parties also made it difficult to clearly communicate about breaks with counterparties.

Ensuring accuracy of their portfolio’s trade economics and valuations against their counterparties was key to reducing risk for the firm, as their hedging is only effective if they have an accurate view of exposures. In addition, they were finding that booking and processing errors had significant cost implications.

 

Our Solution

The firm took the decision to use OSTTRA triResolve for its portfolio reconciliation. Since all of their counterparties use OSTTRA triResolve as their primary swaps reconciliation engine, OSTTRA triResolve was able to streamline onboarding to their web-based leveraged technology platform and the client was up and running in just 10 days.

By centralising the reconciliation process, the firm now has access to all its counterparties in one place. OSTTRA triResolve can help with seamlessly automating the process, centrally receiving and normalising counterparty data and producing match results with a transparent bilateral view between parties.

This has resulted in an efficient, low-touch reconciliation process, where differences are highlighted instantly, enabling the firm to adopt an exception-based workflow. This allows the team to focus on the items that require their attention thus freeing up staff for higher value activities.

 

The firm can now work with its counterparties directly, in real-time, to resolve the differences, as opposed to working independently.

 

Additionally, the platform’s analytical, workflow, and communication tools allow root causes and underlying drivers of differences to be identified, assigned, tracked and resolved, thus contributing to a more accurate view of their portfolios’ exposures.

Positions can now be verified in a fraction of the time, ensuring the firm’s hedges are accurate. The firm has also automatically ingested counterparty mark-to-markets into their price verification process, increasing controls by eliminating any manual involvement.

 

To learn more about Portfolio Reconciliation, click here or contact us at info@osttra.com.

EMIR Post Trade Risk Reduction Service Exemptions from ESMA and the FCA Come into Effect for OSTTRA

LONDON, 8 July 2025 – OSTTRA services have been granted exemptions from mandatory clearing obligations under EMIR by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and from the public reporting requirements under MiFIR by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

OSTTRA triBalance is currently the only provider in the EU approved to carry out post-trade risk reduction services under a clearing exemption, confirmed by ESMA on 16 June 2025. Additionally, the FCA’s exemption from the Derivatives Trading Obligation (DTO), post trade transparency reporting and best execution requirement took effect on 30 June 2025, removing a further obligation from UK based users of OSTTRA’s Post Trade Risk Reduction (PTRR) services. EU based users already benefitted from the equivalent exemptions that came into force with EU MiFIR 3 in 2024.

The clearing obligation was designed to reduce systemic risk by mandating central clearing for certain derivatives, however, the EMIR clearing obligation prevented the use of vanilla swaps for portfolio rebalancing. With the exemption now in place, the OSTTRA service can better optimise risk reduction through a more liquid and widely traded contract, marking a significant milestone in OSTTRA’s efforts to expand the use of post trade risk reduction services.

Previously, swaptions were used as a proxy, but these more complex and costly instruments limited the wider adoption of portfolio rebalancing. This reduced the broader benefits of multilateral participation, preventing widespread reduction of counterparty risk in the financial system. The exemptions from ESMA will better enable OSTTRA to support a wider set of market participants.

A similar decision from the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is under consideration; another key step towards enabling broader market participation. Work is also underway to facilitate similar exemptions from the CFTC and SEC for equivalent rules in the US under the Dodd-Frank Act, which will complete the regulatory alignment needed to fully support multilateral risk reduction and enhanced liquidity.

“This is an important development for our clients, who rely on our services to reduce risk in their portfolios,” commented Kirston Winters, Head of Legal, Risk, Compliance and Government and Regulatory Affairs at OSTTRA. “These exemptions allow us to deliver more efficient and accessible optimisation services, reducing operational complexity and enabling broader participation in multilateral risk reduction – ultimately strengthening the resilience of the financial system. We’re working closely with other regulators to provide additional exemptions, which will further enable firms to use post trade risk reduction services.”

To find out more, talk to a member of our team at at info@osttra.com.

Navigating the Complexities of CVA Risk Capital Calculations: A Global Perspective

Basel III capital rules now require banks globally to choose between the Basic Approach (BA-CVA) and the more risk-sensitive Standardised Approach (SA-CVA) for calculating Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) risk. Many institutions, particularly in the EU, have initially favoured BA-CVA due to lower implementation costs.

In the EU, a significant factor influencing CVA risk capital strategy is the current exemption for corporate and sovereign trades, which reduces the capital cost considerably. However, the long-term stability of this exemption is uncertain. Its potential removal would significantly increase the required CVA capital, possibly shifting the balance in favour of SA-CVA for many institutions. This kind of regulatory uncertainty requires banks worldwide to carefully consider their CVA risk capital strategy and prepare for regulatory shifts.

The choice between BA-CVA and SA-CVA also has important implications for hedging strategies. While SA-CVA allows banks to incorporate market risk hedges into their CVA calculations, BA-CVA does not. Consequently, hedging to reduce P&L volatility might inadvertently increase capital requirements under BA-CVA. Banks, therefore, need to carefully weigh the trade-offs between simplicity, capital efficiency, and hedging effectiveness, a consideration relevant across all jurisdictions.

OSTTRA triCalculate XVA helps banks apply the most appropriate approach to different counterparties. This granular control is crucial for optimising capital and adapting to evolving regulations, both within specific jurisdictions and globally. Furthermore, OSTTRA triCalculate XVA leverages GPU technology to overcome the computational complexity of CVA sensitivity calculations. This enables efficient and timely generation of necessary risk sensitivities, even for large and complex portfolios.

With the Basel III capital rules already implemented in some jurisdictions, the UK set to adopt them in January 2027, and US regulations expected to follow, banks must take a proactive approach to CVA risk capital management. This involves not only considering the current regulatory landscape but also anticipating potential changes and understanding the interplay between CVA risk capital calculations and hedging practices.

A flexible and robust calculation solution, capable of handling the computational demands of CVA, is vital for navigating this complex and globally diverse environment, ensuring long-term compliance and capital efficiency.

OSTTRA triCalculate provides XVA risk calculations across credit, debt, funding, margin, capital and collateral for bilateral OTC derivatives. Our web-based service provides efficient XVA calculations using transparent and consistent models. To learn more, contact us or visit osttra.com/xva

Cash Flow Management: Moving Away from Manual Workflows

Efficient cash flow management is critical for market participants navigating ever-evolving post trade requirements. But existing workflows rely on manual processes, leading to errors and excessive operational demands. Watch the video below to hear from Tom Woolfenden, Product Design Director at OSTTRA, to hear how OSTTRA Cash Flow Management is automating and streamlining operations for firms facing tight deadlines and complex processes.

Our configurable, centralised platform already processes thousands of cash flows, across multiple asset classes and currencies. To find out more, visit osttra.com/cashflow or contact us.

From Rusty Bikes to Formula One: Upgrading Cash Flow Management in Derivatives Trading

Traditionally, the back office has lagged behind the front office in technological advancements, hindering efficiency and accuracy in cash flow management. It’s time to shift gears and unleash the full potential of automation, regardless of asset class or payment type.

In December 2024, Philippe Lintern, the head of the Bank of England’s FX division, compared front office staff using the most advanced technology to Formula One teams, while noting that peers in the back office were left struggling to match the pace on their “rusty old bicycles.” An area where this rings particularly true is the $667 trillion global derivatives space, where cash flow management remains heavily manual, relying on humans, emails and even fax machines, despite the fast-paced world of trading pushing ever increasing volumes through this strained back office infrastructure.

It doesn’t have to be like this. As the dust settles from the all-consuming rush to T+1 settlement, resources can be re-focused on tackling some of the stubborn pockets of manual process that persist in the back office – and with the twin goals of improving both operational and capital efficiency, cash flow management is emerging as a priority.

“Last year we started to see a lot more focus on transparency and automation in post-trade interactions between counterparties, including those processes where custodians are involved, such as cash flow payments,” said Tom Woolfenden, Director, Product Design, OSTTRA. “However, so much manual coordination remains to agree and settle these cash flows.” This has been highlighted recently by the Financial Markets Standards Board in their final standard for sharing of Settlement Instructions, and updated guidance also issued in the Global Foreign Exchange Committee’s revised FX Global Code, such as Principle 44, which states that “Market Participants are encouraged to implement straight-through automatic transmission of trade data from their front office systems to their operations systems”, by means of secure interfaces where the transmitted trade data cannot be changed or deleted during transmission.

Cash flow management itself isn’t a complicated concept: At its core, it’s about making regular payments to the other parties involved in your trades, based on the underlying contract terms and up-to-date valuations.

However, things get incredibly complex when you consider the scale of the market. A large financial institution might handle hundreds of thousands of these trades and their associated cash flows every month. This volume alone makes it difficult to track who owes what to whom. The problem is compounded by the fact that different participants use different data standards, calculation methods, market data sources, and messaging formats. This lack of standardisation can make it extremely challenging to even figure out which specific trade back-office staff are discussing in their emails, or which trade is causing a discrepancy.

“An absolute worst-case scenario is that you’re expecting to receive a cash flow from an open trade, and you have your designs on how to use that money, but your counterparty doesn’t even have an idea that there is an obligation to you”, Woolfenden adds.

Interest rate swaps, equity swaps and portfolio swaps are prime examples of the products where manual cash flow management leads to errors and operational inefficiencies. Take equity swaps for example: Cash flow management for these contracts involves the ongoing payments of the swap for the duration of the trade, as well as the underlying dividends and accruals, all of which need to be calculated, agreed on and then settled, which is where the uncertainty and misalignment comes in.

“We often see market participants taking agreed cash flow information offline, emailing, or even faxing it to their custodian, creating an inefficient communications chain to complete the payment and settlement process,” Woolfenden said.

As settlement times are expected to continue to shorten globally, untangling the confusion will quickly become even more important. Cash flow inefficiencies also prevent liquidity optimisation, or the ability of the front office to deploy cash to generate profits – because the money is stuck in a back-office limbo until the disagreement is resolved.

The most efficient way to resolve this conundrum is bringing transparency into the process for all sides and linking agreed trades with subsequent cash flows so that calculations can be made using consistent economics. OSTTRA Cash Flow Management is an established platform that helps streamline the cash-flow-processing challenge with a standard workflow and matching engine. With legal confirmations for many bilateral OTC trades readily available on OSTTRA MarkitWire and connected to the OSTTRA triResolve reconciliation engine, participants can have complete confidence that they share a common view of a transaction with their counterparties. An automated system that matches cash flows, as well as linking the underlying trades associated with them, removes the need to spend time figuring out who owes what and why: OSTTRA Cash Flow Management also notifies participants if they’re misaligned. It can also bilaterally net matched cash flows into an agreed, reduced number of payments whilst respecting settlement instructions.

“At OSTTRA, we are uniquely positioned to eliminate friction and inaccuracies in derivatives cash flows, thanks to our position at the centre of post-trade, from trade confirmation and processing through to portfolio reconciliation and collateral management, and all the opportunities for improving data standardisation that this brings. The end result is that we can seamlessly automate the entire process, including sending SWIFT settlement messages on behalf of our clients. The settling bank, typically the custodian, can receive an instruction to do the settlement just one minute after the cash flow is matched, removing the all too common merry-go-round of email, phone and fax communication and bringing greater transparency on a real-time basis,” Woolfenden said.

Once the whole lifecycle is automated, conducted in real-time and in a way that’s transparent to parties, calculations can be done on the same basis, payments can be netted and settlement becomes a matter of a simple instruction to the custodian – as easy as riding a bike! To learn more about OSTTRA for Cash Flow Management, please visit osttra.com/cashflow

From T+1 Settlement to the FX Global Code: Unlock Operational Excellence in Post-Trade

Are you ready to elevate your post-trade operations in the face of evolving regulatory demands? T+1 settlement, CSDR, and the FX Global Code are setting new standards for operational excellence, demanding proactive solutions.

Listen as Steve French, Commercial Head for FX & Securities at OSTTRA, discusses how new regulations, industry initiatives and volatile markets are increasing demands for operational resilience and agility.

OSTTRA triResolve Analytics

OSTTRA triResolve analytics provides trend analysis of your trade portfolio from a reconciliation, risk and collateral perspective.

 

 


OSTTRA triResolve Dispute Analytics

OSTTRA triResolve dispute analytics leverages underlying reconciliation data to automate attribution of dispute root cause. The feature enables systematic analysis of what is driving margin call disputes over time.

 

*Accessible to all OSTTRA triResolve clients 

OSTTRA triResolve Dispute Manager

OSTTRA triResolve Dispute Manager combines margin call data with portfolio reconciliation results to automate attribution of dispute drivers and enable a systemic dispute identification, tracking  & resolution process.

 

Services