Novation and backloading of 70,000 trades for G15 bank restructure

Client type:  G15 Bank

 

Challenge:

Following internal restructuring, a G15 bank approached Custom Processing to facilitate the novation and backloading of bilateral trades across OSTTRA MarkitWire.

 

OSTTRA Solution:

Following a review of the scope of work, the G15 bank leveraged the Custom Processing team to handle all activities pertaining to the novation and backloading of trades across OSTTRA MarkitWire

 

OSTTRA Delivered:

 


Customer Benefits

 

Focused, Tried and Tested

 

For more information or to arrange a call with a member of the Team please email info@osttra.com.

TriOptima named Best Compression and Optimization Service

TriOptima named Best Compression and Optimization Service

 

As the transition to the new capital regime on counterparty risk and uncleared financial instruments gathers pace, an increasing number of firms with substantial exposure to over-the-counter (OTC) FX derivatives are looking for ways to reduce their gross notional and counterparty exposure in the most efficient manner.

In 2021, their toil is proving particularly laborious. Hundreds of firms will have been caught by phase five of the uncleared margin rules (UMR), which took effect on September 1, and many more will have to adapt the manner in which they calculate their exposure to derivatives contracts when the last remaining – and some of the largest – jurisdictions shift from the current exposure model to the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR) by the end of 2021.

To fulfil their obligations, many financial firms have sought out TriOptima’s compression and optimization solutions over the past year, with noteworthy effects on the risk exposure of those in the network.
In January alone, $541 billion of gross notional was eliminated by TriOptima’s clients through its triReduce compression service, more than double the amount achieved the previous year. And, similarly, the triBalance service executed its largest ever optimization FX cycle at the beginning of 2021.

“Looking at the past 12 months, I’m most proud of the fact that we are live optimizing capital exposures in an ever-growing network,” says Erik Petri, head of triBalance solutions at TriOptima. “I can say with confidence that we offer the market’s largest optimization network for bilateral counterparty credit risk for the FX market.”

While reducing gross exposure to meet UMR rules and rebalancing counterparty risk to satisfy SA-CCR requirements can be met separately, Petri strongly encourages firms to accomplish both of these within the same cycle, rather than running separate compression and optimization cycles.

“It is extremely important for firms to consider optimizing both UMR and SA-CCR in one go,” he says. “Otherwise they risk suppressing one exposure while increasing the other, and that’s not ideal. In the FX market there is the opportunity to optimise the two in an extremely efficient way.”

The way TriOptima enables firms to achieve both goals simultaneously is that, during the compression side of the cycle, a set of forward and swap trades are replaced with new transactions with a combined gross notional that is worth less than the original notional. During the optimization portion of the cycle, short-term risk-reducing FX non-deliverable forwards and forward hedge trades are introduced across all relationships so each participant remains market-risk neutral. In this way, both initial margin and counterparty credit exposures can be reduced simultaneously, while at the same time reducing the gross notional outstanding.

Until recently, running this type of scenario was largely the remit of global systemically important banks – known as G-Sibs. In the past 12 months, however, an increasing number of smaller sell-side players have joined TriOptima’s network, with the buy-side also showing interest in the benefits that compression and optimization can offer.

“We are now seeing that interest filtering beyond the top-tier banks with regional banks and second-tier banks more focused on net optimization, not only because of the introduction of SA-CCR but also more generically,” says Mattias Palm, head of triReduce FX at TriOptima.

“While SA-CCR is only applicable to banks, we also see increasing interest on the buy-side, even though they’re not directly driven from a capital cost perspective,” says Palm. “Bilateral exposure comes with a cost to everyone, and a lot can be done across all kinds of institutions to minimize it.” While making the necessary technological investments to centralise their portfolios can be considerable for many firms, the benefits for TriOptima’s network of participants, that come from reducing risk through compressing and rebalancing a derivatives portfolio, can run into the millions, not only in the funding cost of initial margin but also the cost of capital.

“It’s impossible to put an exact number at the moment, but we know there are significant savings to be achieved,” says Petri.

“The transition to SA-CCR is a big deal for the industry,” he says. “And it’s something that we expect will drive growth over the coming years. There will be an increased need in the FX industry to keep counterparty credit risk down through rebalancing and compression. FX is one of the asset classes where bilateral liquidity – in terms of outstanding trades – is significant.”

Also worth noting is that OSTTRA’s triCalculate has developed an SA-CCR engine that calculates SA-CCR figures for portfolios containing a wide variety of derivatives transactions – margined and unmargined, as well as bilateral and cleared – across all asset classes, according to the latest guidelines.

OSTTRA’s TriOptima was voted Best compression and optimization service for FX at the 2021 FX Markets e-FX Awards.

OSTTRA triCalculate: Initial Margin Analytics

Case Study 1

Client type: European Pension Fund
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations and Pre-deal check simulations
End User: Derivatives trading and structuring desk

Challenges

Our client who manages the derivatives trading desk at a large European insurance company needed a fast and efficient way of running ‘what-if’ initial margin scenarios in order to optimise exposures before derivatives trade execution.

The client is using OSTTRA triCalculate to calculate their daily IM exposures for derivatives subject to uncleared margin rules. They also benefit from the pre-deal check capabilities of the service which allows them to make informed trading decisions when pricing new deals to find the optimal counterparty in terms of IM. They have been using the service since coming into scope as part of phase 5 of the uncleared margin rules and value having the ability to run fast and efficient pre-deal check simulations. Additionally, they use the pre-deal check module to help mitigate the risk of breaching regulatory UMR or internal thresholds.


 

Case Study 2

Client type: Leading US Regional Bank
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations, stress testing and forecasting
End User: Collateral management team

Challenges

Our client who is part of the regional bank’s collateral management team, needed daily IM exposure calculations.

The client needed to simulate changes to trade populations and to assess their impact on their IM exposures as their auditor required the bank to monitor how trade expirations were leading to changes in IM.

Additionally the client had an internal requirement to occasionally benchmark how their IM exposures would change if they switched calculation model by using the schedule/grid approach instead of the more risk sensitive SIMM model. The client’s risk team also required the collateral team to stress their IM exposures by using stressed and/or alternative sources of market data.


 

Case Study 3

Client type: European Regional Bank
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations and regulatory model backtesting
End User: Credit Risk Manager

Challenges

Our client manages the credit risk management team of a large regional bank that was in scope for the uncleared margin rules for derivatives transactions.

They needed a solution for calculating their daily IM exposures and also a tool to help them cope with the regulatory requirement of backtesting the SIMM model on a quarterly basis. The bank required a backtesting solution to compare the 10 day SIMM IM to 10 day actual P&L moves.


 

Our Solution

These firms took the decision to use OSTTRA for their regulatory IM calculations. The service provides an easy-to-use, web-based solution that streamlines the daily IM process. Our clients benefit from transparency into their IM exposures and the ability to gain a more detailed understanding of their overall IM exposures through pre-deal check simulations, backtesting reports and IM analytics via an intuitive and flexible interface. The interactive interface further allows clients to decompose their total IM exposures into its different components and to run detailed P&L explain reports to understand day-to-day changes in margin amounts.

All clients also benefit from being able to run simulations on trade population changes through the interactive interface by uploading amended input files or performing simulations using alternative market data.

 

For more information about the our Initial Margin analytics service, please email info@osttra.com.

Centralising the reconciliation process for a US Corporate

Client type: Mid sized corporate
Existing reconciliation: In-house/manual

 

Challenges

The firm uses portfolio reconciliation as a financial control around swap position verification and to support the collateral disputes and hedging processes. In addition, they use counterparty mark-to-market as an observation point in their own pricing validation routines.

This was a manual undertaking they supported by collecting daily dealer statements for both swap positions and collateral positions, each from a different source and in its own format.

Given increasing trading volumes and number of counterparties, the lack of automation in the portfolio reconciliation process meant that the operations team struggled to manage these manual tasks in a timely and efficient manner:

The manual nature of the tasks, as well as the dependency on counterparties’ timing and consistency in delivering required statements, meant that a lot of the team’s time and resource was being used to complete the process.

 

Time pressure, a lack of an organised workflow and a multiple-touch point process led to a greater risk of work repetition and an increased number of errors.

 

With an increasing workload, resolving the root cause of the differences was harder to achieve, which in turn was increasing the number of issues. In addition, the lack of transparency on the positions between parties also made it difficult to clearly communicate about breaks with counterparties.

Ensuring accuracy of their portfolio’s trade economics and valuations against their counterparties was key to reducing risk for the firm, as their hedging is only effective if they have an accurate view of exposures. In addition, they were finding that booking and processing errors had significant cost implications.

 

Our Solution

The firm took the decision to use OSTTRA triResolve for its portfolio reconciliation. Since all of their counterparties use OSTTRA triResolve as their primary swaps reconciliation engine, OSTTRA triResolve was able to streamline onboarding to their web-based leveraged technology platform and the client was up and running in just 10 days.

By centralising the reconciliation process, the firm now has access to all its counterparties in one place. OSTTRA triResolve can help with seamlessly automating the process, centrally receiving and normalising counterparty data and producing match results with a transparent bilateral view between parties.

This has resulted in an efficient, low-touch reconciliation process, where differences are highlighted instantly, enabling the firm to adopt an exception-based workflow. This allows the team to focus on the items that require their attention thus freeing up staff for higher value activities.

 

The firm can now work with its counterparties directly, in real-time, to resolve the differences, as opposed to working independently.

 

Additionally, the platform’s analytical, workflow, and communication tools allow root causes and underlying drivers of differences to be identified, assigned, tracked and resolved, thus contributing to a more accurate view of their portfolios’ exposures.

Positions can now be verified in a fraction of the time, ensuring the firm’s hedges are accurate. The firm has also automatically ingested counterparty mark-to-markets into their price verification process, increasing controls by eliminating any manual involvement.

 

To learn more about Portfolio Reconciliation, click here or contact us at info@osttra.com.

OSTTRA triResolve Margin: Collateral Automation

Client type: Major global energy firm
Regulatory impact: UMR Phase 5

 

The introduction of global uncleared margin rules (UMR) drove the need to address technology requirements for both Variation (VM) and Initial Margin (IM) and to establish a more strategic solution with high levels of automation. With a mixture of solutions in place previously, the goal was to adopt industry standards while ensuring scalability for future business growth and expansion.

 

Challenges

As a global energy firm, individual legal entities managed VM separately using their own tools and processes, with limited interaction and oversight at a group level. Tools used included Excel, Treasury applications, and in-house systems. OSTTRA triResolve was used to manage portfolio reconciliation for some, but not all, portfolios.

The effort required to support VM was high, requiring teams in three locations, with manual processing of the entire margin process, from margin call calculation to settlement. With margin calls exchanged via email, users noted long delays to agree and complete calls, particularly when disputes occurred. With a fragmented approach to VM management and portfolio reconciliation, there was no single view of disputes and resolution of breaks was resource intensive.

Driven by a requirement to calculate IM under UMR, the firm feared the existing setup lacked automation and was not sufficient to support a growth in margin requirements. Combined with this, they wanted to achieve a global view of IM at the group level.

 

Our Solution

With different tools in place – and different internal priorities – each entity made initial decisions based on their most pressing requirements. For one entity, this meant selecting OSTTRA triResolve Margin to manage their VM requirements several years before their IM compliance deadline. The goal was to leverage their existing use of OSTTRA triResolve and combine with a fully integrated VM workflow. This allowed them to retire their manual processes quickly.

Moving to OSTTRA triResolve Margin has provided them with a state-of-the-art collateral management system ‒ including automated data capture, electronic margin call exchange with counterparties, and a single consolidated view of both margin calls and disputes. By leveraging the unique ability to combine reconciliation and margin data via OSTTRA triResolve and OSTTRA triResolve Margin, they can identify issues driving disputes in real time.

Moving from an internal tool to a robust workflow driven solution provides oversight and operational efficiencies. By leveraging workflow automation options, they are able to process margin calls automatically, including distribution of calls to counterparties, agreeing to incoming margin requests & booking of collateral. On a typical business day, approximately 90% of all margin calls are processed automatically without the need for any manual user intervention. This approach reduces time and allows users to focus their time and attention where most required, namely to resolve disputes.

Ahead of their IM compliance date, each of the other entities followed suit and onboarded OSTTRA triResolve Margin. First for VM, and then for IM.
With each entity submitting their trades independently for IM calculation, OSTTRA triCalculate generates the IM results for each of them, allowing them to be automatically combined for monitoring at the group level in OSTTRA triResolve Margin. Not only does this allow them to manage their IM alongside existing VM workflows, but it provides an automated alert should an IM tolerance limit be breached.

This approach allows all entities to benefit from the same high levels of automation, plus provides a single shared platform from which they can manage their IM requirements.

 

Looking holistically at the entire margin process, all key tasks are now automated:

  • Data capture
  • Margin calculation
  • Margin call workflow
  • Collateral selection
  • Collateral booking and settlement
  • Dispute management

As firms consider their future collateral state, the key objective shouldn’t simply be replacement of a legacy process, but the strategic adoption of high levels of automation & integrated dispute resolution.

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

Automated margin (VM & IM) solution for Dealer Bank

Client type: Large Japanese dealer bank

Existing support: Installed vendor solution for calculation of margin. Emails for exchange of margin calls and OSTTRA triResolve for dispute resolution.

Collateral profile: In scope for VM and IM requirements. Large number of counterparties across leading jurisdictions.

 

Challenges

The non-cleared margin rules meant the Bank was set to face both new minimum standards for margin and an associated increase in operations and costs.

Due to the Bank’s profile, the key elements of the regulation affecting them included:

After a review of their current external vendor solution, the Bank established that their existing fragmented and manual process was not able to handle the increased number of margin counterparties, margin calls and the calculation and exchange of the new initial margin amounts.

They needed a more efficient way of calculating and agreeing their variation (VM) and initial (IM) margin calls, ideally in one solution.

 

Our Solution

Like all other phase 1 firms impacted by the non-cleared margin rules the Bank took a decision to adopt the ISDA SIMM™ model for calculation of IM. This sensitivity based approach provides a standard model for ease of calculation but perhaps more importantly transparency.

The Bank and all other phase 1 participants recognised the benefit of not only utilising a common IM model, but also in using a standard industry-wide IM calculation and reconciliation engine (Acadia’s IM Exposure Manager) to enable efficient dispute resolution.

With the challenge of calculating IM amounts and resolving disputes addressed with IM Exposure Manager, the Bank then needed a way of handling all of the margin calls in one place and a method to ensure underlying VM and IM data are correct. By adding OSTTRA triResolve Margin to their existing OSTTRA triResolve services, the Bank is able to achieve these objectives. This provides the Bank with a suite of fully integrated web-based platforms which completes the VM and IM circle.

IM

VM

By using OSTTRA triResolve Margin the Bank was able to implement a single solution to address both the VM and IM challenges created by the non cleared margin rules.

 

They were able to go-live ahead of the September 1st 2016 deadline and have expanded their usage when associated regulatory deadlines came into effect in 2017. With the automated workflow, the Bank was able to use the opportunity presented by the regulation, together with new technology, to focus their resources on the risk rather than the process itself.

 

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

SWIFT automation for Collateral Managers

Client type: Large Regional Bank
Regulatory impact: UMR Phase 5 

 

Client summary

A long-time user of OSTTRA services, including OSTTRA triResolve for portfolio reconciliation since 2010, the bank had previously expanded its use to include collateral management support via OSTTRA triResolve Margin to help prepare for UMR compliance. The transition from their previous Front Office collateral system to OSTTRA triResolve Margin provided new support for IM margining, enhanced functionality and improved workflow automation, something that was critical as they anticipated increasing volumes under UMR.

Problem

Under UMR they were subject to new regulatory requirements mandating that they segregate Initial Margin via triparty or 3rd party custodian.  Despite having in-house SWIFT capability for cash & securities collateral settlement, they could not support connectivity to triparty or 3rd party custodians in the same way.  A key challenge was the requirement to connect to multiple custodians, including: Bank of New York Mellon, Clearstream, Euroclear & JP Morgan. Settlement processing was further complicated by a requirement to notify each triparty of movements both when receiving and posting IM collateral.

Standard triparty connectivity options – instructing individual settlements via separate custodian portals, or fax – did not appeal to them.  Similarly, build out of their own connectivity to each custodian was considered costly and inefficient, given no experience with the new collateral segregation models, and magnified by a need to connect to not just their own triparty, but those of their counterparties too.

Our Solution

The Bank took the initial decision to leverage an industry utility for instruction of collateral movements via SWIFT.  However, it soon became clear that it did not provide connectivity to all the required custodians.  As the UMR deadline approached, the Bank decided to supplement the use of the settlement utility and expand their use of OSTTRA triResolve Margin to provide the additional connectivity.

This approach saw the Bank instruct all SWIFT settlements via OSTTRA triResolve Margin, with some being routed via the industry utility, and others being instructed directly via the OSTTRA SWIFT gateway. However, this still required a separate login to the utility to view collateral settlement status updates for those settlements they instructed.

Within weeks of UMR go-live the Bank quickly decided that the ‘dual’ settlement approach was not efficient and opted to extend use of OSTTRA triResolve Margin for the instruction of all collateral transfers and to end their use of the utility. This decision was due to the system’s ability to connect to all triparty agents, support for an extensive set of SWIFT message types and provision of real-time settlement transparency. Further, by combining their margin & settlement workflows in OSTTRA triResolve Margin the Bank was able to increase operational efficiency, as well as reduce the risk of incorrect bookings & failed settlements.

For users, upon completion of the margin call workflow a collateral instruction is automatically generated for approval. The system then automatically creates an IM collateral instruction message (MT527/540/542) which is sent in real-time directly to the required triparty or custodian. Collateral settlement status updates are received (MT558/544/546/548) providing insight and certainty. Additional transparency is provided via collateral reporting which offers a single consolidated view of all collateral assets, regardless of the triparty (MT569/535).

By leveraging OSTTRA triResolve Margin’s robust SWIFT connectivity, the Bank was able to support all requirements without the need for custom development and complex testing. Use of a single solution for both IM margin management & IM collateral settlement allows the Bank to benefit from a fully automated workflow, ensuring maximum levels of STP. From call issuance to collateral instruction, all steps can be automated and managed via a single dashboard, saving time, reducing risk and lowering the chance of failed settlements.

 

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or Contact us

Click here here for more information about SWIFT Settlement.

OSTTRA triResolve Margin: UMR compliance & SWIFT connectivity

Client type: Major Japanese Bank
Regulatory impact: UMR Phase 1

 

Client summary

A long-time user of OSTTRA triResolve for portfolio reconciliation, alongside legacy vendor system for VM collateral management, with manual email-based workflow for exchange of margin calls. Impacted by the first wave of UMR regulations in September 2016, they required new tools to support the IM margin process, including storage of IM agreements; IM call calculation; IM call workflow; support for electronic exchange of IM margin calls; connectivity to industry infrastructure for IM reconciliation and connectivity to triparty agents for collateral settlement.

Problem

The Bank had an existing VM margin process supported by an installed vendor system. While this provided support for the traditional VM call process, it was assessed as not being suitable to support new additional IM margin requirements. Key gaps included no connectivity to industry infrastructure; zero drilldown capability; no automation and onerous requirements for annual system upgrades.

While the Bank’s initial focus was to establish an automated IM margin call workflow, during the UMR project they identified a new problem, previously not in-scope. As they onboarded to new custodians & tri-party agents to support collateral segregation requirements, it quickly became clear they would need to establish a new process to ‘connect’ to each one. Their existing in-house payment system did not support tri-party and traditional options to instruct collateral payments via custodian portals, or fax, were deemed too manual, overly slow and subject to error.

The build out of their own connectivity to each custodian was considered costly and inefficient, given no experience with the new collateral segregation models, and magnified by a need to connect to not just their own tri-party, but those of their counterparties too.

Our Solution

 

The Bank took the decision to implement OSTTRA triResolve Margin for IM margin management.

The provision of a fully automated workflow, combined with integration to both Acadia’s IMEM service, and OSTTRA triResolve, ensured they could manage all IM requirements from a single dashboard.

 

As part of this decision, the Bank also chose to leverage the system’s SWIFT connectivity for settlement automation capability. This was chosen due to the high-level of flexibility and automation it offered. As a global bank they required connectivity not just to their own preferred tri-party, but a wider industry network. This included: BNY Mellon, Clearstream, Euroclear and JP Morgan.

In addition to allowing connectivity to a wide range of custodians, the system also offers support for the specific technical & booking requirements of each one, thus removing the need for complex bespoke configuration. Off the shelf support for a wide range of SWIFT message standards allows instruction of collateral via tri-party or 3rd party methods.

For users, upon completion of the margin call workflow a collateral instruction is automatically generated for approval. The system then automatically creates an IM collateral instruction message (MT527/540/542) which is sent in real-time directly to the required tri-party or custodian. Collateral settlement status updates are received (MT558/544/546/548) providing insight and certainty. Additional transparency is provided via collateral reporting which offers a single consolidated view of all collateral assets, regardless of the tri-party (MT569/535).

By leveraging triResolve Margin’s standard & robust SWIFT connectivity, the Bank was able to go-live quickly, without the need for custom development and complex testing. Use of a single solution for both IM margin management, and IM collateral settlement, allows the Bank to benefit from a fully automated workflow, ensuring an end-to-end STP process. From call issuance to collateral instruction, all steps can be automated and managed via a single dashboard, saving time, reducing risk and lowering the chance of failed payments.

 

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

UMR Compliance: IM Monitoring Case Study

Client type: European Regional Bank
Regulatory impact: UMR Phase 5 – AANA $/€50bn

Client summary

Existing user of both OSTTRA triResolve and OSTTRA triResolve Margin to support portfolio reconciliation and collateral requirements. Firm required to comply with uncleared margin rules (UMR) in phase 5. Primary focus was new support for calculation and monitoring of initial margin and support for potential exchange of IM calls in the future.

Problem

UMR compliance required new daily calculation of initial margin, and the firm needed support for both SIMM and schedule methods. To better understand the impact of UMR – and the potential need for new legal documentation and opening of custodian accounts – the firm wanted to estimate IM exposure per portfolio as early as possible. Based on initial portfolio estimates and a review of trading strategies, it was projected that IM exposure would not exceed the 50M threshold with any counterparty for a while following the September deadline. With IM expected to increase over time, the goal was to actively monitor all portfolios and only begin legal negotiation when tolerances were exceeded.

The UMR project goal was to deliver a solution that could support both calculation and monitoring of initial margin. At the same time, it needed to provide support for potential future exchange of collateral and connectivity to custodians and triparty, should future IM increase above threshold levels.

Solution

 

The firm decided to extend its existing use of OSTTRA services for an integrated UMR solution. The addition of OSTTRA triCalculate provided SIMM sensitivity and initial margin calculation capability and, combined with their existing use of OSTTRA triResolve Margin, allowed them to easily monitor IM exposure.

 

As a licensed ISDA SIMM™ vendor OSTTRA was able to support all IM calculation requirements off the shelf. The firm was able to onboard easily, with  OSTTRA triCalculate requiring only a single Excel trade file to begin calculations. Our team of valuation experts were able to quickly perform data normalization and provide IM results for validation by the Bank. This exercise provided both high-level IM results as well as a SIMM breakdown, allowing the firm to easily compare numbers with counterparties.

OSTTRA triCalculate results feed automatically into OSTTRA triResolve Margin, allowing the client to see IM exposure in their existing dashboard, eliminating any integration effort on the part of the firm. OSTTRA triResolve Margin IM tolerances are defined for each relationship, allowing the firm to set their own custom monitoring limits. Should IM tolerances be exceeded, automated alerts are issued to notify the Bank to take action, for example to begin legal document negotiation.

For additional transparency, OSTTRA triResolve Margin’s threshold monitoring service also provides the Bank with a view of any initial margin calculations shared by their counterparties via Acadias Initial Margin Threshold Monitor (IMTM) service. Active monitoring of IM via the Bank’s existing use of OSTTRA triResolve Margin is designed to simplify processing for users, removing the need for use of multiple platforms or additional data setup.

In the future, should the Bank exceed IM threshold amounts, they are able to easily switch from IM monitoring to active margin call management, using the same dashboard they use today for VM, with integration to both Acadia’s IM Exposure Manager (IMEM) for sensitivity reconciliation and SWIFT for collateral settlement via custodian or triparty.

 

To learn more about Threshold Monitoring, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

Automated margin (VM & IM) solution for Asset Manager

Client type: Major international asset manager with assets in excess of $350bn

Existing collateral support: In-house spreadsheet based solution for calculation of margin. Emails for exchange of margin calls and OSTTRA triResolve for dispute resolution

Collateral profile: In-scope for VM requirements. Trading OTC derivatives in all major markets across several hundred funds, with several thousand collateral agreements

Problem

The company’s internal tools provided limited collateral management capability. This created daily challenges to manage data feeds from multiple trade and market systems, and data quality issues were frequent. The process was time consuming and required a high-level of user input and diligence. As a result, the organisation had an overreliance on counterparty calculated margin amounts and reporting, and felt they were not fulfilling their own risk management objectives.

They needed to update their processes. However, faced with a significant increase in collateral agreements due to the uncleared margin rules, any new solution needed to be fast to implement, scalable and facilitate STP.

Solution

Following an RFP process, OSTTRA triResolve Margin was selected as the solution that best suited their needs. Not only was it deemed to meet all functional requirements, it also fitted with the company strategy of adopting web-based solutions.

Key stakeholders identified a number of key advantages in OSTTRA triResolve Margin. The main drivers included its ability to proactively support the uncleared margin rules, rather than being a retro-fitted product, and unlike other offerings, it provided a seamless way to manage margin call disputes. It also offered out of the box access to the Acadia’s MarginSphere™ messaging service, which in turn would enable automated connectivity to their broker counterparties.

Due to the large volume of collateral agreements, onboarding was phased by a combination of fund and broker. The first phase, in excess of 600 collateral agreements, was live within 2 weeks. The entire onboarding process was managed by the OSTTRA triResolve service management team who took responsibility for the key tasks of collateral agreement set-up and counterparty connectivity and approval in MarginSphere.

Subsequent phases delivered automated margin connectivity for all funds and corresponding dealers, which equated to several thousand collateral agreements.

In a matter of weeks they were able to decommission their old manual processes and achieve unprecedented levels of STP.

 

Services