Automated margin (VM & IM) solution for Asset Manager

Client type: Major international asset manager with assets in excess of $350bn

Existing collateral support: In-house spreadsheet based solution for calculation of margin. Emails for exchange of margin calls and OSTTRA triResolve for dispute resolution

Collateral profile: In-scope for VM requirements. Trading OTC derivatives in all major markets across several hundred funds, with several thousand collateral agreements

Problem

The company’s internal tools provided limited collateral management capability. This created daily challenges to manage data feeds from multiple trade and market systems, and data quality issues were frequent. The process was time consuming and required a high-level of user input and diligence. As a result, the organisation had an overreliance on counterparty calculated margin amounts and reporting, and felt they were not fulfilling their own risk management objectives.

They needed to update their processes. However, faced with a significant increase in collateral agreements due to the uncleared margin rules, any new solution needed to be fast to implement, scalable and facilitate STP.

Solution

Following an RFP process, OSTTRA triResolve Margin was selected as the solution that best suited their needs. Not only was it deemed to meet all functional requirements, it also fitted with the company strategy of adopting web-based solutions.

Key stakeholders identified a number of key advantages in OSTTRA triResolve Margin. The main drivers included its ability to proactively support the uncleared margin rules, rather than being a retro-fitted product, and unlike other offerings, it provided a seamless way to manage margin call disputes. It also offered out of the box access to the Acadia’s MarginSphere™ messaging service, which in turn would enable automated connectivity to their broker counterparties.

Due to the large volume of collateral agreements, onboarding was phased by a combination of fund and broker. The first phase, in excess of 600 collateral agreements, was live within 2 weeks. The entire onboarding process was managed by the OSTTRA triResolve service management team who took responsibility for the key tasks of collateral agreement set-up and counterparty connectivity and approval in MarginSphere.

Subsequent phases delivered automated margin connectivity for all funds and corresponding dealers, which equated to several thousand collateral agreements.

In a matter of weeks they were able to decommission their old manual processes and achieve unprecedented levels of STP.

 

OSTTRA triResolve Margin: Preparing to Exchange IM

Client type: North American Regional Bank
Regulatory impact: UMR Phase 5 – AANA $/€50bn

 

Client summary

In-house solution used for collateral management with manual exchange of margin calls via email, combined with use of OSTTRA triResolve for portfolio reconciliation and dispute investigation. Subject to new uncleared margin rules (UMR) in phase 5. Primary focus was modernisation of their day to day process, including adoption of electronic messaging for margin call exchange, improved workflow support and replacement of legacy processes with automation, plus connectivity to IM infrastructure.

Problem

The use of old technology meant an over reliance on manual processing to support collateral requirements for several hundred margin agreements (both OTC & Repo). Users described the legacy solution as fragmented and error prone, resulting in slow and manual processing of calls. Further, the portfolio reconciliation and dispute investigation processes were not aligned with the collateral infrastructure, thus providing limited transparency. New UMR requirements were estimated to significantly increase margin call volumes.

Their existing collateral solution was designed for Variation Margin and would require extensive effort to build new automation and extend support for Initial Margin. The cost and resources required to extend the legacy system were large, and it became clear this approach didn’t align with the organisation’s strategy for risk and technology. Instead, they undertook an extensive review of vendor solutions via RFP, with the goal of identifying an automated vendor solution that provided support for both VM and IM via a single integrated service.

Solution

 

OSTTRA triResolve Margin was selected to replace the firm’s existing in-house collateral system with the objective of supporting both existing VM and new IM requirements following the September 1st deadline. As an existing OSTTRA triResolve portfolio reconciliation subscriber, the adoption of OSTTRA triResolve Margin was a natural fit.

 

This provided the ability to easily calculate margin calls using the data already submitted for reconciliation purposes, and with ‘one click’ integration between the services, they were able to eliminate the fragmented nature of their previous process. The firm also found new features from the added transparency of being able to see all margin calls derived using both their own, and counterparty, valuations.

With an expected increase in the volume of calls following UMR compliance, the firm required higher levels of automation. A key objective was to reduce the use of email for margin call communications, something they found both manual and slow. OSTTRA triResolve Margin not only solved this challenge with built-in connectivity to Acadia’s Margin Manager messaging service at no additional cost, but it also provides the Bank with the capability to automate the entire call workflow.

In order to provide both transparency and capability to manage disputes, the firm required a collateral solution that connects to both OSTTRA triResolve and Acadia’s Initial Margin Exposure Manager (IMEM) services. Use of OSTTRA triResolve Margin provides this connectivity with zero integration, allowing the Bank to easily drilldown into all VM and IM differences, identify issues, and collaborate with their counterparties to manage exceptions.

Our solution provides the firm with complete support for both VM & IM, an easy to use dashboard, new levels of automation, and connectivity with their counterparties using industry standard tools.

 

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

OSTTRA triCalculate XVA Calculations

Case Study 1

Client type: Leading regional bank
Existing XVA support: In house
End User: Fixed income desk responsible for the Bank’s XVA book

Challenges

Our client, who manages rates volatility and the bank’s XVA book from within the Fixed income desk, required fast and efficient calculations in order to check valuation adjustments for pricing/hedging new deals.

On top of this, our client uses total portfolio XVA for accounting and reporting purposes.

Before using OSTTRA triCalculate, the Bank was running XVA calculations in house which was time consuming. They have kept their internal calculation but use our service as a reliable benchmark in order to cross reference the numbers. They also benefit from the speed of our service when required to make quick trading decisions on pricing new deals. They found that relying on running the calculations manually in house using a spreadsheet produced numerous inconsistencies and was becoming an operational risk. They have now been using the service for more than three years and are very happy with the support and results they have received.


 

Case Study 2

Client type: Regional Bank
Existing XVA support: Alternative vendor installed software
End User: XVA desk with a focus on derivatives pricing

Challenges

Our client manages the XVA desk, with special focus on derivatives pricing including XVA adjustments and needed a fast and reliable source of XVA calculations (especially pre-deal checks) and to calculate overnight CVA/DVA.

The existing vendor solution was unable to handle the pre-deal checks fast enough. The client wanted to switch to a service which offered accurate and efficient pre-deal checks with as little disruption to the business as possible, they understood a switch to our solution would be smooth and well supported.


 

Case Study 3

Client type: Asset Manager
Existing XVA support: Vendor solution
End User: Counterparty Risk Manager

Challenges

The client is the Counterparty Risk Manager and needed a future-proof solution for ISDA SIMM calculation as required under the uncleared margin rules (UMR) regulation.

Additionally, the client needed to calculate pre-settlement exposure (PFE) daily, which they used as an input to determine trading availability per bilateral OTC counterparty. The client’s existing vendor was only able to provide PFE calculations and not IM calculations.


 

Case Study 4

Client type: Regional Bank
Existing XVA support: In house
End User: Risk Management Office

Challenges

The client is part of the Bank’s risk management office and needed CVA/DVA calculations for accountancy purposes.

They had not previously calculated XVA and needed a fast and reliable solution, with no ongoing maintenance required.


 

Case Study 5

Client type: Major multinational energy and gas company
Existing XVA support: In house
End User: Credit Risk Management with a focus on derivatives

Challenges

Our client manages the risk management and quantitative analytics team of a multinational corporate that was in scope for uncleared margin rules (UMR). They needed a sophisticated solution for both initial margin and XVA calculations, especially MVA (margin valuation adjustment) and ‘what-if’ pre-deal check scenarios to optimise bilateral IM exposures.

They had not previously calculated any XVA metrics and their existing in-house solution was unable to calculate initial margin and MVA, or perform any what-if pre-deal check simulations to optimise their global risk management. They needed a reliable solution that could assist with their regulatory requirements while requiring as little implementation as possible. Additionally, they also wanted to be able to benchmark their daily internal potential future exposure (PFE) calculations.


 

Our Solution

These firms took the decision to use OSTTRA triCalculate for their XVA and PFE calculations as the service provides a sophisticated, easy-to-use, web-based solution that automates the XVA calculation process and feeds the calculation results directly into a firm’s reporting mechanisms.

The streamlined onboarding was fast and smooth, minimising the impact on the business, and a case manager was assigned to handle any issues. OSTTRA triCalculate undertook all the data mapping ensuring that the firms existing data file formats could be uploaded directly via the API or via SFTP, giving the clients the option to fully automate the process without having to dedicate time on transforming the data into a specified file format. All clients benefit from having full transparency into XVAs, exposure profiles including expected exposures and expected IM and, if applicable, they can see the impact on these from pre-deal decisions.

 

To learn more about our XVA Calculation Service click here, or email info@trioptima.com.

Trade novation to support Asset Manager merger

Client type: Global Asset Manager

 

Challenge:

Following the completion of an asset manager merger, Custom Processing was approached to facilitate the transfer of selected funds and associated bilateral trades on OSTTRA MarkitWire and OSTTRA Trade Manager

 

OSTTRA Solution:

Following a review of the scope of work, the asset manager leveraged the Custom Processing team to handle all activities pertaining to the novation of trades across OSTTRA MarkitWire and OSTTRA Trade Manager

 

OSTTRA Delivered:

 


Customer Benefits

 

Focused, Tried and Tested

 

For more information or to arrange a call with a member of the Team please email info@osttra.com.

Novation and backloading of 70,000 trades for G15 bank restructure

Client type:  G15 Bank

 

Challenge:

Following internal restructuring, a G15 bank approached Custom Processing to facilitate the novation and backloading of bilateral trades across OSTTRA MarkitWire.

 

OSTTRA Solution:

Following a review of the scope of work, the G15 bank leveraged the Custom Processing team to handle all activities pertaining to the novation and backloading of trades across OSTTRA MarkitWire

 

OSTTRA Delivered:

 


Customer Benefits

 

Focused, Tried and Tested

 

For more information or to arrange a call with a member of the Team please email info@osttra.com.

TriOptima named Best Compression and Optimization Service

TriOptima named Best Compression and Optimization Service

 

As the transition to the new capital regime on counterparty risk and uncleared financial instruments gathers pace, an increasing number of firms with substantial exposure to over-the-counter (OTC) FX derivatives are looking for ways to reduce their gross notional and counterparty exposure in the most efficient manner.

In 2021, their toil is proving particularly laborious. Hundreds of firms will have been caught by phase five of the uncleared margin rules (UMR), which took effect on September 1, and many more will have to adapt the manner in which they calculate their exposure to derivatives contracts when the last remaining – and some of the largest – jurisdictions shift from the current exposure model to the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR) by the end of 2021.

To fulfil their obligations, many financial firms have sought out TriOptima’s compression and optimization solutions over the past year, with noteworthy effects on the risk exposure of those in the network.
In January alone, $541 billion of gross notional was eliminated by TriOptima’s clients through its triReduce compression service, more than double the amount achieved the previous year. And, similarly, the triBalance service executed its largest ever optimization FX cycle at the beginning of 2021.

“Looking at the past 12 months, I’m most proud of the fact that we are live optimizing capital exposures in an ever-growing network,” says Erik Petri, head of triBalance solutions at TriOptima. “I can say with confidence that we offer the market’s largest optimization network for bilateral counterparty credit risk for the FX market.”

While reducing gross exposure to meet UMR rules and rebalancing counterparty risk to satisfy SA-CCR requirements can be met separately, Petri strongly encourages firms to accomplish both of these within the same cycle, rather than running separate compression and optimization cycles.

“It is extremely important for firms to consider optimizing both UMR and SA-CCR in one go,” he says. “Otherwise they risk suppressing one exposure while increasing the other, and that’s not ideal. In the FX market there is the opportunity to optimise the two in an extremely efficient way.”

The way TriOptima enables firms to achieve both goals simultaneously is that, during the compression side of the cycle, a set of forward and swap trades are replaced with new transactions with a combined gross notional that is worth less than the original notional. During the optimization portion of the cycle, short-term risk-reducing FX non-deliverable forwards and forward hedge trades are introduced across all relationships so each participant remains market-risk neutral. In this way, both initial margin and counterparty credit exposures can be reduced simultaneously, while at the same time reducing the gross notional outstanding.

Until recently, running this type of scenario was largely the remit of global systemically important banks – known as G-Sibs. In the past 12 months, however, an increasing number of smaller sell-side players have joined TriOptima’s network, with the buy-side also showing interest in the benefits that compression and optimization can offer.

“We are now seeing that interest filtering beyond the top-tier banks with regional banks and second-tier banks more focused on net optimization, not only because of the introduction of SA-CCR but also more generically,” says Mattias Palm, head of triReduce FX at TriOptima.

“While SA-CCR is only applicable to banks, we also see increasing interest on the buy-side, even though they’re not directly driven from a capital cost perspective,” says Palm. “Bilateral exposure comes with a cost to everyone, and a lot can be done across all kinds of institutions to minimize it.” While making the necessary technological investments to centralise their portfolios can be considerable for many firms, the benefits for TriOptima’s network of participants, that come from reducing risk through compressing and rebalancing a derivatives portfolio, can run into the millions, not only in the funding cost of initial margin but also the cost of capital.

“It’s impossible to put an exact number at the moment, but we know there are significant savings to be achieved,” says Petri.

“The transition to SA-CCR is a big deal for the industry,” he says. “And it’s something that we expect will drive growth over the coming years. There will be an increased need in the FX industry to keep counterparty credit risk down through rebalancing and compression. FX is one of the asset classes where bilateral liquidity – in terms of outstanding trades – is significant.”

Also worth noting is that OSTTRA’s triCalculate has developed an SA-CCR engine that calculates SA-CCR figures for portfolios containing a wide variety of derivatives transactions – margined and unmargined, as well as bilateral and cleared – across all asset classes, according to the latest guidelines.

OSTTRA’s TriOptima was voted Best compression and optimization service for FX at the 2021 FX Markets e-FX Awards.

OSTTRA triCalculate: Initial Margin Analytics

Case Study 1

Client type: European Pension Fund
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations and Pre-deal check simulations
End User: Derivatives trading and structuring desk

Challenges

Our client who manages the derivatives trading desk at a large European insurance company needed a fast and efficient way of running ‘what-if’ initial margin scenarios in order to optimise exposures before derivatives trade execution.

The client is using OSTTRA triCalculate to calculate their daily IM exposures for derivatives subject to uncleared margin rules. They also benefit from the pre-deal check capabilities of the service which allows them to make informed trading decisions when pricing new deals to find the optimal counterparty in terms of IM. They have been using the service since coming into scope as part of phase 5 of the uncleared margin rules and value having the ability to run fast and efficient pre-deal check simulations. Additionally, they use the pre-deal check module to help mitigate the risk of breaching regulatory UMR or internal thresholds.


 

Case Study 2

Client type: Leading US Regional Bank
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations, stress testing and forecasting
End User: Collateral management team

Challenges

Our client who is part of the regional bank’s collateral management team, needed daily IM exposure calculations.

The client needed to simulate changes to trade populations and to assess their impact on their IM exposures as their auditor required the bank to monitor how trade expirations were leading to changes in IM.

Additionally the client had an internal requirement to occasionally benchmark how their IM exposures would change if they switched calculation model by using the schedule/grid approach instead of the more risk sensitive SIMM model. The client’s risk team also required the collateral team to stress their IM exposures by using stressed and/or alternative sources of market data.


 

Case Study 3

Client type: European Regional Bank
IM analytics challenge: IM exposure calculations and regulatory model backtesting
End User: Credit Risk Manager

Challenges

Our client manages the credit risk management team of a large regional bank that was in scope for the uncleared margin rules for derivatives transactions.

They needed a solution for calculating their daily IM exposures and also a tool to help them cope with the regulatory requirement of backtesting the SIMM model on a quarterly basis. The bank required a backtesting solution to compare the 10 day SIMM IM to 10 day actual P&L moves.


 

Our Solution

These firms took the decision to use OSTTRA for their regulatory IM calculations. The service provides an easy-to-use, web-based solution that streamlines the daily IM process. Our clients benefit from transparency into their IM exposures and the ability to gain a more detailed understanding of their overall IM exposures through pre-deal check simulations, backtesting reports and IM analytics via an intuitive and flexible interface. The interactive interface further allows clients to decompose their total IM exposures into its different components and to run detailed P&L explain reports to understand day-to-day changes in margin amounts.

All clients also benefit from being able to run simulations on trade population changes through the interactive interface by uploading amended input files or performing simulations using alternative market data.

 

For more information about the our Initial Margin analytics service, please email info@osttra.com.

Centralising the reconciliation process for a US Corporate

Client type: Mid sized corporate
Existing reconciliation: In-house/manual

 

Challenges

The firm uses portfolio reconciliation as a financial control around swap position verification and to support the collateral disputes and hedging processes. In addition, they use counterparty mark-to-market as an observation point in their own pricing validation routines.

This was a manual undertaking they supported by collecting daily dealer statements for both swap positions and collateral positions, each from a different source and in its own format.

Given increasing trading volumes and number of counterparties, the lack of automation in the portfolio reconciliation process meant that the operations team struggled to manage these manual tasks in a timely and efficient manner:

The manual nature of the tasks, as well as the dependency on counterparties’ timing and consistency in delivering required statements, meant that a lot of the team’s time and resource was being used to complete the process.

 

Time pressure, a lack of an organised workflow and a multiple-touch point process led to a greater risk of work repetition and an increased number of errors.

 

With an increasing workload, resolving the root cause of the differences was harder to achieve, which in turn was increasing the number of issues. In addition, the lack of transparency on the positions between parties also made it difficult to clearly communicate about breaks with counterparties.

Ensuring accuracy of their portfolio’s trade economics and valuations against their counterparties was key to reducing risk for the firm, as their hedging is only effective if they have an accurate view of exposures. In addition, they were finding that booking and processing errors had significant cost implications.

 

Our Solution

The firm took the decision to use OSTTRA triResolve for its portfolio reconciliation. Since all of their counterparties use OSTTRA triResolve as their primary swaps reconciliation engine, OSTTRA triResolve was able to streamline onboarding to their web-based leveraged technology platform and the client was up and running in just 10 days.

By centralising the reconciliation process, the firm now has access to all its counterparties in one place. OSTTRA triResolve can help with seamlessly automating the process, centrally receiving and normalising counterparty data and producing match results with a transparent bilateral view between parties.

This has resulted in an efficient, low-touch reconciliation process, where differences are highlighted instantly, enabling the firm to adopt an exception-based workflow. This allows the team to focus on the items that require their attention thus freeing up staff for higher value activities.

 

The firm can now work with its counterparties directly, in real-time, to resolve the differences, as opposed to working independently.

 

Additionally, the platform’s analytical, workflow, and communication tools allow root causes and underlying drivers of differences to be identified, assigned, tracked and resolved, thus contributing to a more accurate view of their portfolios’ exposures.

Positions can now be verified in a fraction of the time, ensuring the firm’s hedges are accurate. The firm has also automatically ingested counterparty mark-to-markets into their price verification process, increasing controls by eliminating any manual involvement.

 

To learn more about Portfolio Reconciliation, click here or contact us at info@osttra.com.

OSTTRA triResolve Margin: Collateral Automation

Client type: Major global energy firm
Regulatory impact: UMR Phase 5

 

The introduction of global uncleared margin rules (UMR) drove the need to address technology requirements for both Variation (VM) and Initial Margin (IM) and to establish a more strategic solution with high levels of automation. With a mixture of solutions in place previously, the goal was to adopt industry standards while ensuring scalability for future business growth and expansion.

 

Challenges

As a global energy firm, individual legal entities managed VM separately using their own tools and processes, with limited interaction and oversight at a group level. Tools used included Excel, Treasury applications, and in-house systems. OSTTRA triResolve was used to manage portfolio reconciliation for some, but not all, portfolios.

The effort required to support VM was high, requiring teams in three locations, with manual processing of the entire margin process, from margin call calculation to settlement. With margin calls exchanged via email, users noted long delays to agree and complete calls, particularly when disputes occurred. With a fragmented approach to VM management and portfolio reconciliation, there was no single view of disputes and resolution of breaks was resource intensive.

Driven by a requirement to calculate IM under UMR, the firm feared the existing setup lacked automation and was not sufficient to support a growth in margin requirements. Combined with this, they wanted to achieve a global view of IM at the group level.

 

Our Solution

With different tools in place – and different internal priorities – each entity made initial decisions based on their most pressing requirements. For one entity, this meant selecting OSTTRA triResolve Margin to manage their VM requirements several years before their IM compliance deadline. The goal was to leverage their existing use of OSTTRA triResolve and combine with a fully integrated VM workflow. This allowed them to retire their manual processes quickly.

Moving to OSTTRA triResolve Margin has provided them with a state-of-the-art collateral management system ‒ including automated data capture, electronic margin call exchange with counterparties, and a single consolidated view of both margin calls and disputes. By leveraging the unique ability to combine reconciliation and margin data via OSTTRA triResolve and OSTTRA triResolve Margin, they can identify issues driving disputes in real time.

Moving from an internal tool to a robust workflow driven solution provides oversight and operational efficiencies. By leveraging workflow automation options, they are able to process margin calls automatically, including distribution of calls to counterparties, agreeing to incoming margin requests & booking of collateral. On a typical business day, approximately 90% of all margin calls are processed automatically without the need for any manual user intervention. This approach reduces time and allows users to focus their time and attention where most required, namely to resolve disputes.

Ahead of their IM compliance date, each of the other entities followed suit and onboarded OSTTRA triResolve Margin. First for VM, and then for IM.
With each entity submitting their trades independently for IM calculation, OSTTRA triCalculate generates the IM results for each of them, allowing them to be automatically combined for monitoring at the group level in OSTTRA triResolve Margin. Not only does this allow them to manage their IM alongside existing VM workflows, but it provides an automated alert should an IM tolerance limit be breached.

This approach allows all entities to benefit from the same high levels of automation, plus provides a single shared platform from which they can manage their IM requirements.

 

Looking holistically at the entire margin process, all key tasks are now automated:

  • Data capture
  • Margin calculation
  • Margin call workflow
  • Collateral selection
  • Collateral booking and settlement
  • Dispute management

As firms consider their future collateral state, the key objective shouldn’t simply be replacement of a legacy process, but the strategic adoption of high levels of automation & integrated dispute resolution.

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

Automated margin (VM & IM) solution for Dealer Bank

Client type: Large Japanese dealer bank

Existing support: Installed vendor solution for calculation of margin. Emails for exchange of margin calls and OSTTRA triResolve for dispute resolution.

Collateral profile: In scope for VM and IM requirements. Large number of counterparties across leading jurisdictions.

 

Challenges

The non-cleared margin rules meant the Bank was set to face both new minimum standards for margin and an associated increase in operations and costs.

Due to the Bank’s profile, the key elements of the regulation affecting them included:

After a review of their current external vendor solution, the Bank established that their existing fragmented and manual process was not able to handle the increased number of margin counterparties, margin calls and the calculation and exchange of the new initial margin amounts.

They needed a more efficient way of calculating and agreeing their variation (VM) and initial (IM) margin calls, ideally in one solution.

 

Our Solution

Like all other phase 1 firms impacted by the non-cleared margin rules the Bank took a decision to adopt the ISDA SIMM™ model for calculation of IM. This sensitivity based approach provides a standard model for ease of calculation but perhaps more importantly transparency.

The Bank and all other phase 1 participants recognised the benefit of not only utilising a common IM model, but also in using a standard industry-wide IM calculation and reconciliation engine (Acadia’s IM Exposure Manager) to enable efficient dispute resolution.

With the challenge of calculating IM amounts and resolving disputes addressed with IM Exposure Manager, the Bank then needed a way of handling all of the margin calls in one place and a method to ensure underlying VM and IM data are correct. By adding OSTTRA triResolve Margin to their existing OSTTRA triResolve services, the Bank is able to achieve these objectives. This provides the Bank with a suite of fully integrated web-based platforms which completes the VM and IM circle.

IM

VM

By using OSTTRA triResolve Margin the Bank was able to implement a single solution to address both the VM and IM challenges created by the non cleared margin rules.

 

They were able to go-live ahead of the September 1st 2016 deadline and have expanded their usage when associated regulatory deadlines came into effect in 2017. With the automated workflow, the Bank was able to use the opportunity presented by the regulation, together with new technology, to focus their resources on the risk rather than the process itself.

 

To learn more about Collateral Management, click here or contact us at info@trioptima.com.

Services